Surrogate Key Generates Non-numeric Values

Posted on 07.04.2020 by admin

a5e.netlify.com › ▀ Surrogate Key Generates Non-numeric Values

Surrogate Key Generates Non-numeric Values 4,6/5 4748 reviews

Summary: in this tutorial, you will learn how to use the MySQL LAST_INSERT_ID() function to returns the first automatically generated integer successfully inserted for an AUTO_INCREMENT column.

Sql Find Non Numeric Values
Surrogate Key Generates Non-numeric Values Examples
Surrogate Key Generates Non-numeric Values Definition
Example Of Numeric Value
Surrogate Key Generates Non-numeric Values Worksheet
Surrogate Key Generates Non-numeric Values In Excel

A surrogate key is a unique primary key that is not derived from the data that it represents, therefore changes to the data will not change the primary key. In a star schema database, surrogate keys are used to join a fact table to a dimension table. The Surrogate Key Generator stage can have a single input link. To generate keys in sequence from the highest value that was last used, set the Generate Key from Last Highest Value property to Yes. Any gaps in the key range are ignored. To specify a value to initialize the key source, add the File Initial Value property to the Options group, and specify the start value for key. Using a surrogate key is advantageous because it is quicker to join on a numeric field rather than a non-numeric field. This does come at a price — when you insert data into a table, whether via an ETL process or via an “INSERT INTO” statement, the system needs to take more resources to generate the surrogate key. Re: st: finding non-numeric characters before I can destring. From: 'Ben Jann' Prev by Date: Re: st: finding non-numeric characters before I can destring; Next by Date: RE: st: How to merge those files; Previous by thread: Re: st: finding non-numeric characters before I can destring.

Introduction to MySQL `LAST_INSERT_ID()` function

In database design, we often use a surrogate key to generate unique integer values for the primary key column of a table by using the AUTO_INCREMENT attribute:

When you insert a row into the table without specifying a value for the id column, MySQL automatically generates a sequential unique integer for the id column.

The LAST_INSERT_ID() function returns the first automatically generated integer ( BIGINT UNSIGNED) successfully inserted for an AUTO_INCREMENT column.

If you insert multiple rows into the table using a single INSERT statement, the LAST_INSERT_ID() function returns the first automatically generated value only.

If the insertion fails, the result returned by the LAST_INSERT_ID() remain unchanged.

The LAST_INSERT_ID() function works based on client-independent principle. It means the value returned by the LAST_INSERT_ID() function for a specific client is the value generated by that client only to ensure that each client can obtain its own unique ID.

MySQL `LAST_INSERT_ID` function examples

Let’s look at an example of using MySQL LAST_INSERT_ID function.

A) Using MySQL `LAST_INSERT_ID()` function to get value when inserting one row into a table

First, create a new table named messages for testing. In the messages table, we set the AUTO_INCREMENT attribute for the id column.

Second, insert a new row into the messages table.

Third, use the MySQL LAST_INSERT_ID function to get the inserted value of the id column:

Fourth, attempt to insert a null value into the description column:

MySQL issued the following error:

Finally, use the LAST_INSERT_ID function to get the last automatically inserted value:

The result is unchanged.

B) Using MySQL `LAST_INSERT_ID()` function to get value when inserting multiple rows into a table

First, insert three rows into the messages table:

Second, query data form the messages table:

Third, use the LAST_INSERT_ID() function to get the inserted value:

As you can see clearly from the output, the LAST_INSERT_ID() function returns the generated value of the first row successfully inserted, not the last row.

C) Using MySQL `LAST_INSERT_ID()` function in a stored procedure

First, create two tables accounts and phones for testing:

Second, create a stored procedure that inserts an account with a phone number into both tables:

The stored procedure inserts a row into the accounts table, get the account id using the LAST_INSERT_ID() function, and use this account id for inserting a phone into the phones table. A row in the phones table should only exist if there is a corresponding row in the accounts table, therefore, we put both inserts into a transaction.

Third, call the stored procedure CreateAccount to create a new account with a phone number:

Fourth, query data from the accounts table:

And phones table:

It works as expected.

Finally, attempt to create a new account with the value of the last name is null:

MySQL issued an error:

In this tutorial, you have learned how to use the MySQL LAST_INSERT_ID function to return the first automatically generated integer successfully inserted for an AUTO_INCREMENT column.

A surrogate key (or synthetic key, entity identifier, system-generated key, database sequence number, factless key, technical key, or arbitrary unique identifier^{[citation needed]}) in a database is a unique identifier for either an entity in the modeled world or an object in the database. The surrogate key is not derived from application data, unlike a natural (or business) key which is derived from application data.^[1]

Definition[edit]

There are at least two definitions of a surrogate:

Surrogate (1) – Hall, Owlett and Todd (1976): A surrogate represents an entity in the outside world. The surrogate is internally generated by the system but is nevertheless visible to the user or application.^[2]
Surrogate (2) – Wieringa and De Jonge (1991): A surrogate represents an object in the database itself. The surrogate is internally generated by the system and is invisible to the user or application.

The Surrogate (1) definition relates to a data model rather than a storage model and is used throughout this article. See Date (1998).

An important distinction between a surrogate and a primary key depends on whether the database is a current database or a temporal database. Since a current database stores only currently valid data, there is a one-to-one correspondence between a surrogate in the modeled world and the primary key of the database. In this case the surrogate may be used as a primary key, resulting in the term surrogate key. In a temporal database, however, there is a many-to-one relationship between primary keys and the surrogate. Since there may be several objects in the database corresponding to a single surrogate, we cannot use the surrogate as a primary key; another attribute is required, in addition to the surrogate, to uniquely identify each object.

Although Hall et al. (1976) say nothing about this, others^[specify] have argued that a surrogate should have the following characteristics:

the value is unique system-wide, hence never reused
the value is system generated
the value is not manipulable by the user or application
the value contains no semantic meaning
the value is not visible to the user or application
the value is not composed of several values from different domains.

Surrogates in practice[edit]

In a current database, the surrogate key can be the primary key, generated by the database management system and not derived from any application data in the database. The only significance of the surrogate key is to act as the primary key. It is also possible that the surrogate key exists in addition to the database-generated UUID (for example, an HR number for each employee other than the UUID of each employee).

A surrogate key is frequently a sequential number (e.g. a Sybase or SQL Server 'identity column', a PostgreSQL or Informixserial, an Oracle or SQL ServerSEQUENCE or a column defined with AUTO_INCREMENT in MySQL). Some databases provide UUID/GUID as a possible data type for surrogate keys (e.g. PostgreSQL UUID or SQL Server UNIQUEIDENTIFIER).

Having the key independent of all other columns insulates the database relationships from changes in data values or database design (making the database more agile) and guarantees uniqueness.

In a temporal database, it is necessary to distinguish between the surrogate key and the business key. Every row would have both a business key and a surrogate key. The surrogate key identifies one unique row in the database, the business key identifies one unique entity of the modeled world. One table row represents a slice of time holding all the entity's attributes for a defined timespan. Those slices depict the whole lifespan of one business entity. For example, a table EmployeeContracts may hold temporal information to keep track of contracted working hours. The business key for one contract will be identical (non-unique) in both rows however the surrogate key for each row is unique.

SurrogateKey	BusinessKey	EmployeeName	WorkingHoursPerWeek	RowValidFrom	RowValidTo
1	BOS0120	John Smith	40	2000-01-01	2000-12-31
56	P0000123	Bob Brown	25	1999-01-01	2011-12-31
234	BOS0120	John Smith	35	2001-01-01	2009-12-31

Some database designers use surrogate keys systematically regardless of the suitability of other candidate keys, while others will use a key already present in the data, if there is one.

Some of the alternate names ('system-generated key') describe the way of generating new surrogate values rather than the nature of the surrogate concept.

Approaches to generating surrogates include:

Universally Unique Identifiers (UUIDs)
Globally Unique Identifiers (GUIDs)
Object Identifiers (OIDs)
Sybase or SQL Server identity column IDENTITY OR IDENTITY(n,n)
OracleSEQUENCE, or GENERATED AS IDENTITY (starting from version 12.1)^[3]
SQL ServerSEQUENCE (starting from SQL Server 2012)^[4]
PostgreSQL or IBM Informix serial
MySQLAUTO_INCREMENT
SQLiteAUTOINCREMENT
AutoNumber data type in Microsoft Access
AS IDENTITY GENERATED BY DEFAULT in IBM DB2
Identity column (implemented in DDL) in Teradata
Table Sequence when the sequence is calculated by a procedure and a sequence table with fields: id, sequenceName, sequenceValue and incrementValue

Advantages[edit]

Immutability[edit]

Surrogate keys do not change while the row exists. This has the following advantages:

Applications cannot lose their reference to a row in the database (since the identifier never changes).
The primary or natural key data can always be modified, even with databases that do not support cascading updates across related foreign keys.

Requirement changes[edit]

Attributes that uniquely identify an entity might change, which might invalidate the suitability of natural keys. Consider the following example:

An employee's network user name is chosen as a natural key. Upon merging with another company, new employees must be inserted. Some of the new network user names create conflicts because their user names were generated independently (when the companies were separate).

In these cases, generally a new attribute must be added to the natural key (for example, an original_company column).With a surrogate key, only the table that defines the surrogate key must be changed. With natural keys, all tables (and possibly other, related software) that use the natural key will have to change.

Some problem domains do not clearly identify a suitable natural key. Surrogate keys avoid choosing a natural key that might be incorrect.

Performance[edit]

Surrogate keys tend to be a compact data type, such as a four-byte integer. This allows the database to query the single key column faster than it could multiple columns. Furthermore, a non-redundant distribution of keys causes the resulting b-tree index to be completely balanced. Surrogate keys are also less expensive to join (fewer columns to compare) than compound keys.

Compatibility[edit]

Sql Find Non Numeric Values

While using several database application development systems, drivers, and object-relational mapping systems, such as Ruby on Rails or Hibernate, it is much easier to use an integer or GUID surrogate keys for every table instead of natural keys in order to support database-system-agnostic operations and object-to-row mapping.

Uniformity[edit]

When every table has a uniform surrogate key, some tasks can be easily automated by writing the code in a table-independent way.

Validation[edit]

It is possible to design key-values that follow a well-known pattern or structure which can be automatically verified. For instance, the keys that are intended to be used in some column of some table might be designed to 'look differently from' those that are intended to be used in another column or table, thereby simplifying the detection of application errors in which the keys have been misplaced. However, this characteristic of the surrogate keys should never be used to drive any of the logic of the applications themselves, as this would violate the principles of Database normalization.

Disadvantages[edit]

Disassociation[edit]

The values of generated surrogate keys have no relationship to the real-world meaning of the data held in a row. When inspecting a row holding a foreign key reference to another table using a surrogate key, the meaning of the surrogate key's row cannot be discerned from the key itself. Every foreign key must be joined to see the related data item. If appropriate database constraints have not been set, or data imported from a legacy system where referential integrity was not employed, it is possible to have a foreign-key value that does not correspond to a primary-key value and is therefore invalid. (In this regard, C.J. Date regards the meaninglessness of surrogate keys as an advantage. ^[5])

To discover such errors, one must perform a query that uses a left outer join between the table with the foreign key and the table with the primary key, showing both key fields in addition to any fields required to distinguish the record; all invalid foreign-key values will have the primary-key column as NULL. The need to perform such a check is so common that Microsoft Access actually provides a 'Find Unmatched Query' wizard that generates the appropriate SQL after walking the user through a dialog. (It is, however, not too difficult to compose such queries manually.) 'Find Unmatched' queries are typically employed as part of a data cleansing process when inheriting legacy data.

Surrogate keys are unnatural for data that is exported and shared. A particular difficulty is that tables from two otherwise identical schemas (for example, a test schema and a development schema) can hold records that are equivalent in a business sense, but have different keys. This can be mitigated by NOT exporting surrogate keys, except as transient data (most obviously, in executing applications that have a 'live' connection to the database).

When surrogate keys supplant natural keys, then domain specific referential integrity will be compromised. For example, in a customer master table, the same customer may have multiple records under separate customer IDs, even though the natural key (a combination of customer name, date of birth, and E-mail address) would be unique. To prevent compromise, the natural key of the table must NOT be supplanted: it must be preserved as a unique constraint, which is implemented as a unique index on the combination of natural-key fields.

Query optimization[edit]

Relational databases assume a unique index is applied to a table's primary key. The unique index serves two purposes: (i) to enforce entity integrity, since primary key data must be unique across rows and (ii) to quickly search for rows when queried. Since surrogate keys replace a table's identifying attributes—the natural key—and since the identifying attributes are likely to be those queried, then the query optimizer is forced to perform a full table scan when fulfilling likely queries. The remedy to the full table scan is to apply indexes on the identifying attributes, or sets of them. Where such sets are themselves a candidate key, the index can be a unique index.

These additional indexes, however, will take up disk space and slow down inserts and deletes.

Normalization[edit]

Surrogate keys can result in duplicate values in any natural keys. To prevent duplication, one must preserve the role of the natural keys as unique constraints when defining the table using either SQL's CREATE TABLE statement or ALTER TABLE ..ADD CONSTRAINT statement, if the constraints are added as an afterthought.

Nov 28, 2017 Microsoft Office 365 Product Key Generator 2018 with Activator Microsoft office 365 Product Key is a complete package of tools that help to make office full version to use its all features easily and freely. This tool will help you to do offline office software by Microsoft and joined version of. Apr 05, 2018 Microsoft Office 365 Product Key Generator 2018 Crack Full Version Free used for activation of Microsoft Office 365 product full version free. Microsoft Office 365 Crack is the complete product that developed by Microsoft corporation. Microsoft Office 365 Product Key Activator is a complete all-in-one package of tools that support to make. Microsoft office key generator 2018. Microsoft Office 2019 Product Key Generator + Crack ISO Full Version. Microsoft Office 2019 Product Key Generator is a modern tool. Released nowadays with a lot of advance option. Setup is the free week ago to maintain the official authority and has a lot of new things included in it. In Microsoft Office 2019 has added so much addition that. Mar 26, 2020 Microsoft Office 365 Product Key Generator Microsoft office 365 is a complete package of tools that help to make office full version to use its all features easily and freely. This tool will help you to do offline office software by Microsoft and joined a version of some online. After complete downloading, you must have to download Microsoft Office 2018 Crack from the link on the bottom of this page. Then run the official setup first and install the trial version. After that, you have to open the crack file as an administrator and hit the activate Microsoft office 2018. Microsoft office 2018.

Business process modeling[edit]

Because surrogate keys are unnatural, flaws can appear when modeling the business requirements. Business requirements, relying on the natural key, then need to be translated to the surrogate key. A strategy is to draw a clear distinction between the logical model (in which surrogate keys do not appear) and the physical implementation of that model, to ensure that the logical model is correct and reasonably well normalised, and to ensure that the physical model is a correct implementation of the logical model.

Inadvertent disclosure[edit]

Proprietary information can be leaked if sequential key generators are used. By subtracting a previously generated sequential key from a recently generated sequential key, one could learn the number of rows inserted during that time period. This could expose, for example, the number of transactions or new accounts per period. There are a few ways to overcome this problem:

Increase the sequential number by a random amount.
Generate a random key such as a UUID

Inadvertent assumptions[edit]

Sequentially generated surrogate keys can imply that events with a higher key value occurred after events with a lower value. This is not necessarily true, because such values do not guarantee time sequence as it is possible for inserts to fail and leave gaps which may be filled at a later time. If chronology is important then date and time must be separately recorded.

References[edit]

Citations[edit]