Openssl Generate Rsa Key From Modulus And Exponent 3,5/5 5881 reviews
  1. Openssl Generate Rsa Key From Modulus And Exponent 1
  2. Generate Rsa Private Key From Modulus And Exponent
toRSAPublicKey.c

Openssl Generate Rsa Key From Modulus And Exponent 1

Openssl Generate Rsa Key From Modulus And Exponent

Generate Rsa Private Key From Modulus And Exponent

#include<string.h>
#include<openssl/rsa.h>
#include<openssl/evp.h>
#include<openssl/bn.h>
#include<openssl/pem.h>
// cheating, . ignoring deprecation warnings
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored '-Wdeprecated-declarations'
unsignedchar *base64_decode(constchar* base64data, int* len) {
BIO *b64, *bmem;
size_t length = strlen(base64data);
unsignedchar *buffer = (unsignedchar *)malloc(length);
b64 = BIO_new(BIO_f_base64());
BIO_set_flags(b64, BIO_FLAGS_BASE64_NO_NL);
bmem = BIO_new_mem_buf((void*)base64data, length);
bmem = BIO_push(b64, bmem);
*len = BIO_read(bmem, buffer, length);
BIO_free_all(bmem);
return buffer;
}
BIGNUM* bignum_base64_decode(constchar* base64bignum) {
BIGNUM* bn = NULL;
int len;
unsignedchar* data = base64_decode(base64bignum, &len);
if (len) {
bn = BN_bin2bn(data, len, NULL);
}
free(data);
return bn;
}
EVP_PKEY* RSA_fromBase64(constchar* modulus_b64, constchar* exp_b64) {
BIGNUM *n = bignum_base64_decode(modulus_b64);
BIGNUM *e = bignum_base64_decode(exp_b64);
if (!n) printf('Invalid encoding for modulusn');
if (!e) printf('Invalid encoding for public exponentn');
if (e && n) {
EVP_PKEY* pRsaKey = EVP_PKEY_new();
RSA* rsa = RSA_new();
rsa->e = e;
rsa->n = n;
EVP_PKEY_assign_RSA(pRsaKey, rsa);
return pRsaKey;
} else {
if (n) BN_free(n);
if (e) BN_free(e);
returnNULL;
}
}
voidassert_syntax(int argc, char** argv) {
if (argc != 4) {
fprintf(stderr, 'Description: %s takes a RSA public key modulus and exponent in base64 encoding and produces a public key file in PEM format.n', argv[0]);
fprintf(stderr, 'syntax: %s <modulus_base64> <exp_base64> <output_file>n', argv[0]);
exit(1);
}
}
intmain(int argc, char** argv) {
assert_syntax(argc, argv);
constchar* modulus = argv[1];
constchar* exp = argv[2];
constchar* filename = argv[3];
EVP_PKEY* pkey = RSA_fromBase64(modulus, exp);
if (pkey NULL) {
fprintf(stderr, 'an error occurred :(n');
return2;
} else {
printf('success decoded into RSA public keyn');
FILE* file = fopen(filename, 'w');
PEM_write_PUBKEY(file, pkey);
fflush(file);
fclose(file);
printf('written to file: %sn', filename);
}
return0;
}
  • In the RSA algorithm the public key is build using the modulus and the public exponent, which means that we can always derive the public key from the private key. OpenSSL can easily do this with the rsa module, producing the public key in PEM format.
  • Reconstruct RSA public key from exponent and modulus Via ASN1 definition and OpenSSL. Create an asn1 definition file, replace the yellow color value with the value obtained in step (1). Openssl rsa -in pubkey.der -inform der -pubin -out pubkey.pem (6) Obtain the Public Key in PEM file. Cat pubkey.pem. Guide OpenSSL Public Key.
  • Online jwk to pem online, pem to jwk online. Thanks for using this software, for Cofee/Beer/Amazon bill and further development of this project please Share. Any private key value that you enter or we generate is not stored on this site, this tool is provided via an HTTPS URL to ensure that private keys cannot be stolen, for extra security run this software on your network, no cloud dependency.

Jun 12, 2015 This code is pre-ARC and RSAPublic key is just a class that contains NSData for the modulus and exponent. The modulus and exponent in my case are provided in string format from.net and I base64 decode them to get my NSData. It uses the crypto library from openssl.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
A TI-83+ graphing calculator displaying a sine wave

The Texas Instruments signing key controversy refers to the controversy which resulted from Texas Instruments' (TI) response to a project to factorize the 512-bitRSAcryptographic keys needed to write custom firmware to TI devices.

Project[edit]

In July 2009, Benjamin Moody, a United-TI forum user, published the factors of a 512-bit RSA key used to sign the TI-83+ series graphing calculator. The discovery of the private key would allow end users to flash their own operating systems onto the device without having to use any special software. Moody used two free implementations of the general number field sieve, msieve and ggnfs; the computation took 73 days on a 1.9 GHz dual-core processor. This demonstrates the progress of hardware development: the factorization of the similar 512-bit RSA-155 in 1999 using the same algorithm required a large dedicated research group, 8000 MIPS-years of computing time, and a Cray C916 supercomputer.[1]

In response, members of the wider TI graphing calculators community (at yAronet) set up a BOINC-based distributed computing project, RSA Lattice Siever (RSALS for short), that quickly factored the other keys.[2]RSA Lattice Siever remained active for nearly three years after outliving its initial purpose, by factoring other integers for the mathematical community.After factoring over 400 integers,[3] RSALS moved to RSALS-inspired NFS@home[4] at the end of August 2012.

Legal response[edit]

Texas Instruments began by sending out two initial DMCA take-down requests to the hackers, referring to sites or forum posts that they controlled.[5][6] The hackers responded by removing the keys, without consulting an attorney.[7] TI then sent further DMCA notices to a variety[8] of websites displaying the keys, including United-TI, reddit, and Wikipedia.[9] Texas Instruments' efforts then became subject to the Streisand effect,[10] and the keys were mirrored on a number of sites, including WikiLeaks[11] and WordPress. In September 2009, Dan Goodin from The Register alerted the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) to TI's actions, and the EFF agreed to take on the case pro bono, representing three people who had received DMCA notices.

On October 13, 2009, the EFF sent a letter to TI warning them that the posting of the keys did not violate the DMCA, and that it might be liable for misrepresentation.[12] Despite the letter by the EFF, TI continued to send DMCA notices to websites that posted the keys, but stopped doing so after late 2009. The EFF filed a DMCA Section 512 counter-notice on behalf of three of the bloggers who received DMCA notices. When the EFF did not receive a response by the deadline, the bloggers reposted the content that had been taken down.[13]

Cryptographic keys[edit]

The public RSA parameters of the original TI-83+ / TI-83+ Silver Edition OS signing key factored by Benjamin Moody are the following 512-bit modulus n and public (or encryption) exponent e (specified in hexadecimal):[14]

By factoring n, Moody obtained the factors p (252 bits) and q (260 bits), which can be used in turn to quickly compute the 512-bit private (or decryption) exponent d = e−1 mod (p−1)(q−1):

The value d can then be used to sign arbitrary OS software.

The keys factored by RSA Lattice Siever (the TI-92+, TI-73, TI-89, Voyage 200, TI-89 Titanium, TI-84+ / TI-84 Silver Edition OS signing and date-stamp signing keys) are similar but with different values of n, p, q, and d. A single date-stamp signing key is shared by all models.

GitHub.com Authentication Connecting to GitHub with SSH Generating a new SSH key and adding it to the ssh-agent Generating a new SSH key and adding it to the ssh-agent After you've checked for existing SSH keys, you can generate a new SSH key to use for authentication, then add it to the ssh-agent. If you have GitHub Desktop installed, you can use it to clone repositories and not deal with SSH keys. It also comes with the Git Bash tool, which is the preferred way of running git commands on Windows. Ensure the ssh-agent is running: If you are using the Git Shell that's installed with GitHub Desktop, the ssh-agent should be running. Git ssh key generation github.

The suitability of a hash-function depends on how fast the function is in software compared to how expensive it is to implement in hardware. It will be easier and faster to query a database for 128-bits than for 2.2 MB of data.The main difference between hashing and encryption is that a hash is not reversible. How do an hash key that generate less collution

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^Herman te Riele (1999-08-26), New factorization record (announcement of factorization of RSA-155). Retrieved on 2008-03-10.
  2. ^'All TI Signing Keys Factored — ticalc.org'. www.ticalc.org. Retrieved 2009-09-21.
  3. ^http://boinc.unsads.com/rsals/crunching.php
  4. ^http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=306539&postcount=434
  5. ^'brandonw.net'. brandonw.net. Retrieved 2010-05-24.
  6. ^'Signing Keys and the DMCA — ticalc.org'. www.ticalc.org. Retrieved 2009-09-21.
  7. ^'Texas Instruments aims lawyers at calculator hackers'. The Register. 2009-09-23. Retrieved 2011-01-01.
  8. ^'UPDATE: Hey, TI, Leave Those Kids Alone Electronic Frontier Foundation'. Eff.org. 2009-09-25. Retrieved 2010-05-24.
  9. ^'DMCA Texas Instruments'. 2009-09-25. Retrieved 2014-02-03.
  10. ^'Schneier on Security: Texas Instruments Signing Keys Broken'. www.schneier.com. Retrieved 2009-10-06.
  11. ^Suppressed Texas Instruments cryptographic signing keys, 28 Aug 2009 at WikiLeaks. Archived on 10 April 2012.
  12. ^'EFF Warns Texas Instruments to Stop Harassing Calculator Hobbyists'. EFF official press release. Retrieved 2009-10-25.
  13. ^Granick, Jennifer (October 29, 2009). 'Hey, Texas Instruments -- Stop Digging Holes'. EFF Deeplinks Blog. Retrieved 2009-10-29.
  14. ^'File'. WikiLeaks. Archived from the original on 2012-04-10. Retrieved 2012-04-10.

External links[edit]

  • Suppressed Texas Instruments cryptographic signing keys, 28 Aug 2009 at the Wayback Machine (archived June 6, 2010) at the Internet Archive. The file at the Wayback Machine (archived June 6, 2010).
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Texas_Instruments_signing_key_controversy&oldid=951332857'